Section 8
EFFECTS OF INTRA AND INTER SPECIFIC INTERACTIONS ON SEED GERMINATION IN WEEDS
Background
Ecologists study how interactions among organisms and their environments
influence the distribution and abundance species. The habitat available
to a species depends upon abiotic factors such as climatic factors and interactions
with other individuals. Although abiotic factors such as temperature and
moisture often place habitat restrictions on species, interactions with
other individuals also often influence which habitats are open to a species.
We distinguish between intra specific interactions, which involve
members of the same species, and inter specific interactions, which
involve members of different species.
Most ecological investigations into the effects of intra and inter specific
interactions on plant species distributions use adult plants or seedlings.
Few studies address whether these interactions operate at the seed phase
of the life cycle.
During this lab segment, your group will:
- Pose a question related to the effects of intra and inter specific interactions
on seed germination in selected weed species
- Design an experiment that allows you to address that question
- Collect and analyze data from this experiment
- Report your conclusions
BEFORE YOU COME TO LAB
Meet with your lab group and:
- Review the "Potential Research Systems" material
- Discuss which type of system interests you most
- Frame a question that you wish to address using this system
- Discuss your design options for an experiment that will allow you to address
your question
- Prepare a brief presentation of your research proposal. You will make
an oral presentation of this proposal in lab.
POTENTIAL RESEARCH SYSTEMS
Inter specific Effects of Pokeweed Chemicals on Seed Germination
Pokeweed (Phytolacca americana) tissues contain chemicals that inhibit
germination of its own seeds (Edwards et al., 1988). Why would a plant produce
compounds that hinder its own reproduction? Pokeweed fruits mature in the
fall, and Edwards (1988) suggested that these chemicals might delay germination
until the spring when conditions are more suitable for growth and survival.
However, several other hypotheses could explain the evolution and maintenance
of this situation.
1. The chemicals may limit rodent predation on seeds. In this case, the
benefits of rodent avoidance must be greater than any costs associated with
inhibition ofseed germination. A group could treat sunflower seeds or baits
made of sugar and shortening with pokeweed berry juice and compare predation
on this group with a control group.
2. The chemical may limit competition from other species. If the pokeweed
chemicals inhibit seed germination of other species or kill the seeds of
those species outright, then pokeweed's production of these chemicals may
be adaptive. A group could expose seeds of other species such as white campion
or rye grass to pokeweed tissue extracts and compare the germination and
survival of these seeds with a control group.
References
Edwards, M., E. Harris, F Wagner, C. Cross, and
G. Miller. 1988. Seed germination of American Pokeweed (Phytolacca americana).
I. Laboratory techniques and autotoxicity. American Journal of Botany 75:1794-1802.
(On reserve)
Leck, M.A. et al. Eds. 1989. Ecology of Soil Seed
Banks. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. (Call # 582.E19 - On reserve)
Rice, E.L. 1995. Biological Control of Weeds and
Plant Diseases: Advances in Applied Allelopathy. Norman, OK: University
of Oklahoma Press. (Call # 632.9R495b - On reserve)
Intra specific Interactions and Bulbul Germination in Wild Garlic
Wild garlic (Allium vineale ) is the little, chive like plant that
you can find growing on just about any lawn in Davidson. Wild garlic can
reproduce sexually via seeds or asexually via bulbuls. Most reproduction
appears to occur via the bulbuls. All of the bulbuls produced by a wild
garlic plant are genetically identical to each other.
Dr. Margaret Ronsheim (1994, 1996) wanted to determine the relative benefits
of producing genetically variable vs. genetically identical progeny. Several
theories predicted that she would find better germination and growth in
arrays of genetically variable individuals than arrays of genetically identical
individuals since plants in genetically variable arrays may differ in their
resource requirements and susceptibilities to pathogens. Instead, Ronsheim
found better germination and growth in genetically identical arrays than
in the genetically variable groups in both field and the greenhouse experiments.
Why do genetically identical sets of wild garlic bulbuls perform better
than genetically variable arrays? One potential explanation suggests that
the bulbuls produce germination enhancing chemicals and that these chemicals
are clone specific. In other words individuals surrounded by members of
their own clone might receive higher doses of such chemicals than those
surrounded by members of other clones. A group could test this hypothesis
by creating genetically identical and variable arrays of seeds and comparing
the rate of germination and growth of the two groups.
Reference
Ronsheim, M.L. 1996. Evidence against frequency-dependent
advantage for sexual reproduction in Allium vineale. American Naturalist
147:718-734. (On reserve)
Ronsheim, M.L. 1994. Dispersal distances and predation rates of sexual and asexual propagules of Allium vineale L. American Midland Naturalist 131:55-64. (On reserve)
Effects of Small Population Size on Seed Viability
Most ecologists fear that small, isolated populations will be drawn into
an "extinction vortex." The extinction vortex theory (described
in Primack, 1995) speculates that as population size becomes small, breeding
among close relatives will increases and the fitness of many offspring will
be compromised due to a rise in the frequency of individuals homozygous
for deleterious alleles. As the average fitness drops, then the population
size will become smaller, which will exacerbate inbreeding depression and
further lower individual fitness. As such, the population size will spiral
down towards extinction.
This extinction vortex scenario constitutes a logical theory, but we have
little empirical data available to test the hypotheses associated with this
theory. One hypothesis predicts that small, isolated populations should
show lower seed viability than large populations. A group could compare
seed viability between these types of populations. I have collections of
white campion (Silene latifolia) seeds from large populations and
small isolated ones. We could also collect morning glory (Ipomea spp.)
seeds from large and small populations in the Davidson area. Seed viability
can be tested using a simple tetrazolium stain.
References
Caro,T.M and K. Laurenson. 1994. Ecological and
genetic factors in conservation: a cautionary tale. Science 263:485-486.
(On reserve)
Primack, R.B. 1995. A Primer of Conservation Biology.
Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. (Call # 333.95P952p - On reserve)
Effects of Interactions between Varieties of Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa is a plant specially bred for rapid growth and development.
Under the correct conditions, this species can go from seed to seed in as
little as four weeks. B. rapa var. wild plants reach heights of 13-22
cm tall at maturity while those of B. rapa var. rosette reach heights
of only 5-15 cm at maturity. A lack of gibberellic acid production produces
dwarfing in the rosette variety, (Wisconsin Fast Plants Program, 1989).
Gibberellins are plant hormones which affect stem height and, in many species,
promote germination. Although the height differences between the wild and
rosette varieties are well documented, we do not know if the lack of gibberellin
in the rosette variety also slows the rate of germination. We also do not
know if gibberellin from a wild plant can escape into the surrounding environment
and influence the germination and growth of the rosette variety.
A group could compare germination rates in wild and rosette varieties of
B rapa. The group could also compare germination of isolated rosette
seeds and rosette seeds in the presence of wild type seeds.
References
Campbell, N.E. 1993. Biology. 4th ed. Benjamin/Cummings
Publishing Co. Redwood City, CA. (Your text)
Wisconsin Fast Plant Program. 1989. Wisconsin
Fast Plants Growing Instructions. Carolina Biological Supply. Burlington,
NC. (On reserve)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: This lab was developed by Dr. Patricia A. Peroni.
© Copyright 2000 Department of Biology, Davidson
College, Davidson, NC 28036
Send comments, questions, and suggestions to: macampbell@davidson.edu