**Effects of
Pollen Addition on Andromonoecy in Horsenettle ( Solanum carolinense
) **

Janet C. Steven and Patricia A. Peroni

Department of Biology, Davidson College

**Abstract**

**
**We examined the effects of pollen addition
and flower number on fruit and seed set in

2. Do pollen additions also affect the production of male and hermaphroditic flowers?

3. Is total flower number or the percentage of flowers that are male on a plant related to percent fruit set, and therefore possibly related to the attraction of pollinators?

We conducted pollen additions on 25 plants in each of two populations, and also monitored 25 control plants at each site. The mean percent fruit set and seed set per fruit of the pollen addition treatment was significantly greater than that of the control, which indicates that both populations are pollen limited. Fruit production did not correlate with total flower number or percent male flowers, which implies that a larger floral display does not affect the receipt of compatible pollen from pollinators. These results suggest that male flowers may provide increased opportunities for plants to sire offspring, either by allowing more cost effective pollen production or more efficient uptake of pollen by bees than hermaphroditic flowers. The percent of flowers on a plant that were male was significantly greater in the pollen addition treatment than in the control, which suggests that pollen addition affects gender expression in horsenettle. Pollen limitation may select for an increase in pollen or flower production, and andromonoecy may provide the flexibility in resource allocation that makes such an increase possible.

**METHODS**

**
* **Sampled two populations in Giles Co,
VA - Givens and Domermouth

*

-pollen addition

-open pollinated control

*

-marked all flowers as opened and recorded sex

-applied pollen to all open hermaphroditic flowers on plants assigned to pollen addition treatment

-recorded eventual fate of each flower

-measured height of each plant and density of conspecifics

-dried to constant mass and weighed

-counted seed number for each of 20 randomly selected fruits

Hermaphroditic horsenettle flower. Note the large functional pistil that extends beyond the anthers.

Male horsenettle flower. Note the
absence of a functional pistil.

**Figure 1:** Mean
fruit set of plants on finished inflorescences in pollen addition and control
treatments in two horsenettle populations. Two-way ANOVA results indicate
significant population (F=27.50; df=1,88; p=0.0001) and treatment (F=45.47;
df=1,88; p=0.0001) effects. Fruit set is expressed as the percentage of
hermaphroditic flowers that set fruit on inflorescences that finished flowering.
In the pollen addition treatment, n=23 and n=25 for Domermouth and Givens,
respectively. For the control, n=26 in both populations. Error bars represent
2 standard error from the mean.

**Figure 2:** Mean
of the average fruit mass per plant in mg in two horsenettle populations.
Two-way ANOVA results indicated significant population (F=5.79; df=1,79;
p=0.0185) and treatment effects (F=10.85; df=1,79; p=0.0015). All fruits
were set by flowers open during the manipulations. Mature fruits were collected
and dried to constant mass. In the pollen addition treatment, sample size
was n=18 and n=20 for Givens and Domermouth, respectively. In the control
treatment, sample size was n=20 and n=22 in the Givens and Domermouth populations
respectively. Error bars represent 2 standard error from the mean.

**Figure 3:** Fruit
mass vs. number of seeds per fruit. Number of seeds per fruit showed a significant
regression with fruit mass (Rsquare= 0.7996, F=471.84, df=1,18, p<0.0001).
Best fit line: number of seeds= -0.7698 + 0.312089*(fruit mass). N=20 fruits.

**Figure 4:** Mean
percent male flowers on finished inflorescences in pollen addition and control
treatments in two horsenettle populations. Results of an ANCOVA that used
plant height and density of conspecifics as covariates indicate a significant
treatment effect (F=5.69; df=1,86; p=0.0192). In the pollen addition treatment,
n=23 and n=25 for Domermouth and Givens respectively. For the control, n=26
in both populations. Error bars represent 2 standard error from the mean.

**Figure 5:** Percent
fruit set vs. total flower number and percent male flowers for plants in
control treatment only. Percent fruit set expressed as fraction of hermaphroditic
flowers that set fruit. Percent male flowers represents the percentage of
all flowers on a plant that were male. N=26 plants per population. Results
of both Spearman and Pearson correlation analyses indicate no significant
correlation between percent fruit set and either total flower number or
percent male flowers.

**CONCLUSIONS**

**
* **Both populations are pollen limited.

*

*

*

*

Male flowers may benefit plants if they:

- permit better or more efficient pollen uptake and transfer than bisexual flowers

- provide a cost effective mechanism for increasing pollen supplies.

- Return to top of page

- Return To Students' Home Pages

- Return to Davidson College Biology Department Home Page

© Copyright 2000 Department of Biology, Davidson
College, Davidson, NC 28036

Send comments, questions, and suggestions to: **macampbell@davidson.edu**