|
Treatment and further directions:
Pathology: Paucibacillary leprosy (associated with tuberculoid leprosy) is characterized by hypopigmented areas of the skin which have lost feeling (3, 4). Due to its association with tuberculoid leprosy (as opposed to lepromatous leprosy), it is possible that paucibacillary leprosy is not contagious (4). Multibacillary lepsory is characterized by lesions on the skin, nodules, thickened skin, and damage to the nasal passages (3, 4). Serious multibacillary leprosy can lead to the loss of limbs – the loss of feeling prevents the adequate care of cuts or burns on extremities, which may lead to gangrenous infections and eventual amputation (4). Furthermore, serious leprosy of the nasal passages can cause loss of the nose or the eye (4). In some cases, severe infection may cause reduced output of testosterone from the testes, causing impotence and infertility in men (4). Loss of digits due to multibacillary leprosy (link) Prevalence:
Treatment: The WHO’s multi-drug therapy includes the drugs rifampicin and dapsone, with the inclusion of clofazimine for multibacillary cases (6). These drugs are put into ‘blister packs’, which make the drug easier to administer (6). Furthermore, this therapy has caused no resistance to develop, and is considered both safe and effective in treating leprosy (6). One important note is that multi-drug therapy for leprosy is provided free by the WHO for anyone who requires therapy (7). Rifampicin works by inhibiting the actions of bacterial RNA polymerase during bacterial peptide production in the cell (2). The rifampicin molecule binds close to the active site of the bacterial polymerase, preventing RNA elongation after 2-3 nucleotides (2). This way, the bacteria is inhibited from creating more bacterial particles in the cell and infection is stopped (2). Dapsone works similar to sulfonamides, in that it inhibits the synthesis of dihydrofolic acid, a component of the bacterial cell wall (8). In higher doses, dapsone can also significantly reduce inflammation due to disease, although the mechanism of this action is not well understood (8). However, there are a few drawbacks to the WHO’s drug therapy. First of all, the typical drug regimen suggested by the WHO can be very difficult to attain in developing countries – where leprosy is most prevalent (3).
Future directions: Another goal is to culture M. leprae in vitro, which has so far proven impossible (1). In vitro culture of the mycobacterium would significantly help in the characterization of the bacteria and how it affects the human body, and would prove helpful in other mycobacterial infections, such as M. tuberculosis as well (1).
Sources: 1. Barker, L. 2006. Mycobacterium leprae interactions with the host cell: recent advances (Review article). Indian J Med Res, 123: 748-59. 2. Campbell, E. A., Korzheva, N., Mustaev, A., Murakami, K., Nair, S., Goldfarb, A., Darst, S. A. 2001. Structural Mechanisms for Rifampicin Inhibition of Bacterial RNA Polymerase. Cell. 104: 901-12. 3. “Hansen’s Disease: Leprosy”. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases. Dept. of Human Health and Services. October 2005. link 4. “Leprosy”. The Merck Manuals: Online Medical Library. Merck 1 Co., Inc. February 2003. link 5. “Leprosy Elimination: Eliminating Leprosy”. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. 2005. link 6. “Leprosy Elimination: MDT Overview”. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific. 2005. link 7. “Leprosy Fact Sheet”. World Health Organization. October 2005. link 8. Wolf, R., Matz, H., Orion, E., Tuzun, B., Tuzun, Y. 2002. Dapsone. Dermatology Online Journal. 8(1):2. link
Copyright Alex Greer 2007 For questions/comments, please contact Immunology professor Dr. Sofia Sarafova at Davidson College. |