![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
The prominence
of reciprocal altruism is a testament to a vervet’s ability to recognize
relationships among group members and predict their behavior. Reciprocal
altruism is defined as "an exchange of beneficial acts between individuals,
in which the benefits to the recipient exceed the cost to the altruist"
(Vermeer 1993). Cooperation of this kind can only occur with frequent
encounters between individuals. Most cooperative interactions occur between
kin, while reciprocity between non-kin is quite rare. Grooming serves
to develop a more affinitive relationship between non-kin, increasing
their chances of cooperation. While grooming, the groomer removes ectoparasites
by picking through the fur of the groomee. In fact, this behavior is considered
to be the most common affinitive behavior among non-human primates. Vervets
are known to be more likely to support an unrelated individual if he/she
has previously behaved affinitively towards the potential supporter. A
more dominant individual, for example, will form an alliance with a subordinate,
who has groomed her before, against an aggressor who harasses the subordinate.
Cooperative behavior of this kind could facilitate the establishment of
long-term social bonds from which individuals could benefit from future
reciprocal actions (Seyfarth and Cheney 1984). Higher-ranking matrilines
receive more non-matrilineal support than other matrilines in the troop.
As mentioned previously, high ranking matrilines are considered more valuable
as reciprocators for future support in agonistic interaction. This is
because the probability of future aid is higher if a high- |
||||||||||||
Courtesy of
P. and H. Harris |
||||||||||||
ranking individual is the target of some affiliative behavior by the subordinate. High-ranking individuals win more agonistic contests than lower-ranking individuals. The main components allowing for the success of reciprocal altruism is the existence of prior and subsequent interactions between the individuals (Vermeer 1993).. This is why this strategy is so effective within the vervet monkey troop. The highly social environment in which they live is highly conducive to constant interactions between and among individuals. |
||||||||||||
![]() |
Allomothering
is another form of cooperation that serves to benefit both mother and
allomother. For a mother, reduced time and energy directed towards the
rearing of an infant can lead to shorter inter-birth intervals, and thus
greater reproductive success. An allomother is defined as an immature
individual who is not yet physiologically capable of breeding. An allomother
gains valuable maternal experience which readies her for the successful
rearing of her first infant. Studies have demonstrated that females experienced
in infant handling and caretaking, through allomothering as juveniles,
are more likely to effectively raise their first born infant. Allomothering
is found to be preferentially directed towards infant siblings and infants
of higher-ranking females. The latter individuals are thought to have
higher value as associates regarding reciprocal altruism, and are thus
|
|||||||||||
helped more often by other lower-ranking individuals. The juvenile female is the most common type of allomother, and the mother controls her access to the infant. Infant mortality tends to be related to a mother's age, and thus her experience, so allomothering promotes a decline in infant mortality once the individual is ready to reproduce (Fairbanks 1990). The dominant male is considered to be a great altruist for his ever vigilant sentinel behavior. Sentinel behavior is depicted in an individual when he remains alert, stationed in a prominent location, while members of his group forage nearby. Usually, the dominant male is positioned conspicuously atop a nearby tree. His white pelage of his ventral surface is completely exposed.He does not feed or change |
||||||||||||
| station, but
sits alertly, vigilant of any approaching predators. This behavior is
termed altruistic since for a male, there is not much relatedness in the
group because he is an immigrant. His main objects of protection are his
offspring and potential mates in the group. The sentinel's primary purpose
is to warn his troop members of impending predator attacks. This is conveyed
through a series of visual, rather than vocal cues. His conspicuous position
allows for maintaining visual contact with the group. Foragers are warned
by reading the sentinel's actions. Vocalizations would alert the approaching
predator to the presence of the troop. Refraining from this strategy would
decrease the mortality risk of foragers and permit for only a temporary
retreat, resuming foraging after the predator has gone. Vocalizations
are only used in the cases of a surprise attack or knowledge that the
predator has already spotted the troop. In these cases, vocalizations
serve to distract the predator while alarming foragers. Visual signals
rather than aural signals are the preferred media for these altruistic
sentinels (Horrocks 1990). |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
Courtesy of
Meg LaFontaine |
||||||||||||