Social organization and Spacing

 

 

Social Organization and SpacingThe social organization of vampire bats consists of colonies within the roost sites. The colonies vary in size based on the size of the roost. They often contain about 100 bats, but they have been known to contain up to 2,000 individuals (Holzman 1999). The males and females commonly share the same roost, though they are in different groups within the roost. The social system is complex, made up of a main, predominately female, group and temporary male bachelor groups (Park 1991). New born males and females are part of the main group, but males either leave or are forced out when they reach sexual maturity between 12 and 18 months of age (Wilkinson 1984).

Shi Ryong Park (1991) observed the development of social structure in a captive colony of vampire bats. He concluded that the main group was very cohesive and consisted of adult females, infants, and one harem male. The females in the main group were integrated firmly into the group during the entire thirty months of observation. [It must be noted that this was a captive colony where the bats were not allowed to move to other roost sites and join other groups. Such movement has been observed in the wild by Trajano (1996)]. But, even in the wild, the females groups show cohesiveness, and strong social interactions while together.

Wilkinson (1984) provides an explanation for the cohesive female groups through a test he conducted that examined eight possible selective advantages of living together. He examined whether “females roost together to (1) share a suitable microclimate, (2) avoid predators, (3) avoid ectoparasite infestations, (4) minimize travel to mobile prey animals, (5) respond to coercive males, (6) feed simultaneously from a bite, (7) remove ectoparasites by allogrooming, (8) share food by regurgitating blood to other bats within roosts.” Wilkinson concluded that the only plausible selective advantage to the female groups is for food sharing. The data did not indicate any advantage gained by the other hypotheses. It is possible that avoidance of predators and ectoparasites has an influence on the aggregations, but they would only account for short-term aggregations and not the long term associations that were observed.

The harem male (synonymous with alpha male) lives within the same space as the female group, but he rarely comes into physical contact with the females, except for mating. The other males form much less cohesive groups, which Park labels as temporary bachelor groups. These bachelor groups are organized by a dominance hierarchy. Park suggests that the hierarchy is rather dynamic, because he observed the harem male position change twice during the course of his observations. The order of the male hierarchy is shown by their location with respect to the females. The alpha male resides virtually within the female group. The beta male is the next closest to the females, then the gamma male, and so on (see image below). The alpha through the gamma male show territorial behavior in protecting their roost sites. Their territories are only used for roosting and mating, so they are considered mating only territories. The males below the gamma position do not show significant territorial defense, and so are considered to be home range. So, it can be said that the top three males are the only bats that are territorial and all others, including males and females, are home range. The selective advantage for the male hierarchy and territory system is related to the mating system of vampire bats, which is discussed in another section.

 

link to home page

link to references

 

link to Davidson Biology Homepage

link to Animal Behavior Home Page