Home Page

Pathogen Description

Pathogen Life Cycle

Innate Immune Response

Humoral Immune Response

Cellular Immune Response

Evasion of Immune System Detection

References

Future Directions
There are a multitude of areas of possible future research involving Rickettsia rickettsii. One major area involves the specific mechanism of tissue and organ injury, specifically the method by which R. rickettsia increase vascular permeability and what early changes are induced (specifically the innate immune system’s signaling the adaptive immune response release of effector molecules) from the infection of the pathogen. There are three main theories currently under examination, but it is not clear which one is the true method by which the pathogen damages cell tissues. The first theory states that the reduced delivery of oxygen and nutrients to tissues results in decreased blood volume, pulmonary edema-associated hypoxemia, vascular occlusion, and coagulation. This theory alone, however, does not explain all of the symptoms of this disease. The second theory involves the endothelium expressing an activated phenotype upon infection and an attempt to kill rickettsiae intracellularly. The endothelial cells interact with leukocytes that secrete cytokines that create a reaction similar to the typical inflammation response. The cytokines and chemokines produced by these cells as a result of a R. rickettsii infection are not known. The third theory involves the direct triggering of vascular permeability through changes in the cytoskeleton and the proteins at adherens and tight junctions. This theory is supported by the detection of circulating endothelial cells found in humans infected with these bacteria. (Walker et al., 2003)

Late (petechial) rash on palm and forearm

Photo courtesy of the CDC - http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/rmsf/Signs.htm

Although the rickettsial genomes are known, there has not been any virulence factors determined based on this information. The adhesins have not all been identified. In addition, another future study could be surrounding the gene for rickettsial phospholipase A2, which is hypothesized to be the mechanism by which the bacteria escape phagosomes upon initial infection. There is also a lack of evidence surrounding the in vitro vs. in vivo differences in the infection, especially due to the tick saliva modifications present in the infection of humans. Finally, there is also some confusion in the importance of the reactive oxygen species because this injury is not prevalent in animals. (Walker et al., 2003)

There is also a lot of room for research in the development of a vaccine for this disease. There are three vaccines against Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, but none have proven to be sufficiently effective. These vaccines include the inactivation with Romalin in the infected tick tissue vaccine in the 1920s-30s, the infected chicken yolk sac vaccine withdrawn from use in the 1970s, and the infected cell culture vaccine that has never been released for public use. These vaccines all failed to adequately protect humans infected with R.rickettsii. (Williams et al., 1986) A new direction in the development of a vaccine is currently being explored surrounding the examination of the cross-protective immunity produced by the nonpathogenic strand R.rhipicephali to infections of R. rickettsii. If the protective antigens involved in both nonpathogenic and pathogen strands of rickettsiae can be identified and characterized, this could allow for the discovery of the mechanism of rickettsial immunity, which could then lead to a potential vaccine for the disease. (Gage et al., 1992)

The mechanism of rickettsial penetration into eukaryotic cells is still not fully understood. (Silverman et al., 1992) To learn more information about the possible areas of research in this field, as well as the current theories of this topic, see Pathogen Life Cycle.

Back to top

Davidson College Homepage

This webpage was produced as an assignment for an undergraduate course at Davidson College. If you have any questions or comments please contact Dr. Sophia Sarafova via email at sosarafova@davidson.edu because I will no longer be present at said institution. Additional comments can be directed to me at liwoeste@davidson.edu.